Submitted by Anonymous on
MP3
Reward for filling the request:
40
Request details:
Discogs.com or other URL*: https://www.discogs.com/release/174829-G-Spencer-Meets-Dougal-Gammer-Wonderful-Life-Light-Of-Passion
Catalog number*: JELLY010
Year*: 2003
I already have a lower bitrate version of this from a scener, so am hoping someone has a much better rip. Thanks.
20 Comments
#1Distorted_Revelations2022-10-18 00:34
better?
https://krakenfiles.com/view/ORa6Z1RMq0/file.html
#2Jon Doe2022-10-18 00:51
these are incredible! cheers man.
#3admin2023-12-11 15:25
I need help, someone please explain to Jon Doe why this request can't be reuploaded, i've tried:
Or maybe I should just ban him?
#4Jon Doe2023-12-11 16:36
You said no reupload needed, when there is. Just because it's not been filled, why can't we ask what's been uploaded to get reupped?
Pointless making users who contribute a good amount to this site to be held to these weird rules and other ones, fair enough leeches.
#5admin2023-12-11 17:59
#6Q912023-12-11 20:50
I have to give Jon Doe right though. DR forgot to make it filled, so it's still listed as Open, and only way to make people notice it is to make a comment somewhere (which would fit best right here).
If it's about how he formulated his question, what should we write the next time this happens again?
"Can admin close this so I can make a fill-request"?
#7admin2023-12-11 22:35
I don't know atm what happened a year ago with DR's comment: he forgot to select 'Fill', uploaded an incomplete release, uploaded the wrong release, etc.
Anyway, the request is still open and can't be reuploaded because it wasn't uploaded.
Anyone can write a comment that contains related information but not a reupload request.
Or simply push a request to the top by clicking one button.
And by the way, Jon Doe already downloaded this release a year ago, judging by his grateful comment.
#8Jon Doe2023-12-11 22:46
Maybe stick a reupload button on comments that have a links?
#9Jon Doe2023-12-11 22:49
Everything else is so convoluted, another wouldn't hurt.
#10rene13cross2023-12-11 23:41
Maybe the request should have been "pushed forward" to be filled properly
#11Jon Doe2023-12-12 00:58
That's a good point, rene.
#12admin2023-12-12 07:50
Pushing forward a request generally means taking actions to advance or promote a particular request within the system. The goal of pushing forward a request is often to increase its visibility and chances of being noticed and addressed by the community. Explain please, how that may help with proper filling a request.
#13rene13cross2023-12-12 11:48
Your explanation of what pushing forward actually does seems to achieve what was being asked for, i.e. the request being filled with DRs original upload, or someone else filling it.
But maybe I'm not understanding something here...
#14rene13cross2023-12-11 22:34
Although these are basically 192kbps, they sound great to me: https://pixeldrain.com/u/bEdiZKDf
#15Jon Doe2023-12-11 22:50
There's are much appreciated, rene.
#16Distorted_Revelations2023-12-11 23:02
https://pixeldrain.com/u/5BemRMLG
this is what i uploaded back in the day
#17Jon Doe2023-12-11 23:07
Cheers mate
#18rene13cross2023-12-12 03:47
Might be a good idea to just fill the request with this now
#19Borgild2023-12-12 03:53
Different encoders in the tracks, 2nd one @ 48 kHz sampling rate, both tracks got actual freq cut below 320 kbps' default of 20,5 kHz :(
#20rene13cross2023-12-11 23:04
nm